1

Cybercrime Literature Review

Digital forensics is the cornerstone of offering essential tools and methodologies to understand, investigate, and combat contemporary digital threats. It adjusts to the challenges that cybercriminals present in various areas, such as the dark web, the Internet of Things (IoT), and general inquiries into criminality. Alaidi et al. (2022) conducted an important inquiry into the dark web, an acknowledged center for illegal activity. To gather and categorize content from this elusive area of the internet, their study developed a web crawler. Notably, their study brought to light the challenges that the dark web has for gathering and classifying data and its dynamic character. By doing this, they emphasized how important digital forensics is to tackling the complexity of cybercrimes on the dark web. They demonstrated their technological proficiency in content classification using machine-learning methods, specifically the Linear Support Vector Classifier (LSVC). The LSVC is a useful tool for content classification on the dark web because of its remarkable 91% accuracy rate, highlighting its capacity to handle high-dimensional input space.

The Internet of Things (IoT), a constantly growing network of linked gadgets, has come into focus, according to Atlam et al. (2019). Because of the increase in security threats and cybercrimes brought on by the spread of IoT, the study emphasized the critical necessity for strong security mechanisms within IoT devices. Their study outlined the unique challenges that IoT forensics must overcome, including limited storage, a wide range of IoT devices, and a deficiency of specialized forensic instruments. In this case, digital forensics proved to be essential for tackling the constantly changing threats present in the Internet of Things. Moreover, Atlam et al. introduced components including temporal synchronization, memory management, and effective communication, underscoring the significance of real-time forensic methodologies in preserving data integrity. The importance of digital forensics in reducing the cybersecurity risks related to the Internet of Things was highlighted by their findings. On the evolving landscape of cybercrime investigations, Horan and Saiedian (2021) provided a comprehensive analysis. In the arsenal of the cyber investigator, they outlined the essential responsibilities of digital forensics and open-source intelligence. Their research stood out for highlighting the multifaceted character of cybercrime cases and emphasizing how crimes can appear on various digital platforms and sources. In this context, digital forensics was introduced as the key to solving the intricate riddle of cybercrimes. It quickly became a necessary tool for navigating the intricate internet terrain and acquiring vital information.

Enacting laws and regulations that work is essential to preventing cybercrimes, upholding the rule of law, and protecting people and businesses in the rapidly changing digital world. The broader subject of digital forensics and cybercrime investigations includes this issue as an essential element. The legal and regulatory context in which digital forensics and cybercrime investigations occur is inextricably tied to this text. To guarantee the admission of digital evidence in court, digital forensics must conform to legal norms and regulations to be effective. Legal frameworks also guide cybercrime investigations in identifying, apprehending, and punishing cyber criminals.

Understanding the significant societal ramifications of information technology and the urgent need for strong legal frameworks, Koto (2021) explores the legal aspects of cybercrime in the Indonesian setting. The study emphasizes how comprehensive laws and regulations are required to deal with cybercrimes. Koto’s work demonstrates the intrinsic connection between legal requirements and the efficacy of cybercrime investigations. The statement highlights that the absence of clearly defined legal rules could potentially hinder the endeavors of digital forensics. Losavio et al. (2019) highlight the developing nature of digital forensics and its challenges, such as variations in procedural regulations and technical methods. The significance of reliability in digital forensics is emphasized by this work, which also highlights its broader societal ramifications. Their emphasis on the legal framework in which digital forensics functions highlights the need for consistent guidelines and practices throughout the industry. The study emphasizes how legal frameworks direct digital forensics procedures, guaranteeing accuracy and dependability in the gathering and presenting digital evidence.

Threats to people and organizations arise due to an increase in cybercrimes that coincide with the advancement of technology and the prevalence of global connectivity. Regarding preventive methods intended to avoid and mitigate security threats, this problem closely aligns with the broader subject of digital forensics and criminal investigations. To the overarching subject of digital forensics and cybercrime investigations, cybersecurity and crime prevention are inextricably interwoven. Cybersecurity aims to stop incidents and protect systems from possible threats, whereas digital forensics concentrates on post-event analysis and evidence collection. The two domains provide complementary functions within the broader context of cybercrime.

The integral importance of technology in promoting global connectivity and trade is acknowledged by Mohsin (2021). But the study also highlights how this technical advancement has led to an increase in cybercrimes. Mohsin emphasizes how crucial it is for legal frameworks to adjust to adequately safeguard people and businesses. The overarching theme of cybersecurity and its function in reducing security threats in the digital age is directly related to this work. To handle digital threats before they develop into serious cybercrimes, Mohsin highlights the value of preventative measures in cybersecurity. Rajput and Chudasama (2021) explore the increasing sophistication of cybercriminals that attack people and companies. Their research highlights the need for comprehensive security measures and the increasing complexity of cybercrimes. In line with the broader issue of cybersecurity measures and their function in combating digital threats, they examine various methods for preventing and responding to cybercrimes. The work of Rajput and Chudasama highlights the proactive aspect of cybersecurity and its vital role in impeding hackers’ attempts before they can carry out their nefarious acts.

Cybersecurity is largely concerned with proactive methods to prevent and safeguard against cybercrimes, whereas digital forensics mostly focuses on post-incident analysis and evidence collecting. Effective cybersecurity measures enhance the job of digital forensics by preventing cybercrimes and security breaches, so there is a close relationship between cybersecurity and digital forensics. In their exploration of the crucial field of cybersecurity, Shah and Chudasama (2021) highlight the function of cybersecurity in defending cyberspace against cybercrimes. Their study highlights the critical role of cybersecurity in a world driven by technology, as well as the need for preventive measures and approaches in the fight against cybercrimes. They also stress how closely cybersecurity and digital forensics are related. Cybersecurity and digital forensics are tightly related. It offers the tools required to properly investigate and lessen cybercrimes when they happen.

This study highlights the critical synergy between cybersecurity and digital forensics. While cybersecurity focuses on stopping and guarding against these crimes, digital forensics plays an essential role in the aftermath of cybercrimes by looking into and obtaining evidence. The study of Shah and Chudasama highlights how these two domains are closely related in the fight against cybercrimes in today’s technologically advanced society. Combining preventive and investigative strategies for comprehensive cybersecurity, it highlights the cooperative approach needed to effectively manage digital threats.

In conclusion, digital forensics plays a vital role in responding to the evolving landscape of cybercrimes in fields including the dark web, IoT, and general investigations. Reliability and integrity are guaranteed by legal frameworks that direct its operations. By proactively preventing and minimizing digital threats, cybersecurity enhances digital forensics. Together, investigation, legal requirements, and prevention create a symbiotic relationship that efficiently addresses the dynamic challenges of modern cybercrimes.

References

Alaidi, A. H. M., Al_airaji, R. M., Alrikabi, H. Th. Salim., Aljazaery, I. A., & Abbood, S. H. (2022). Dark web illegal activities crawling and classifying using data mining techniques.
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM),
16(10), 122–139.

Almadhoor, L., & Al, E. (2021). Social media and cybercrimes.
Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT),
12(10), 2972–2981.

Atlam, H. F., Alenezi, A., Alassafi, M. O., Alshdadi, A. A., & Wills, G. (2019). Security, cybercrime and digital forensics for IoT. In
Principles of Internet of Things (IoT) Ecosystem: Insight Paradigm (pp. 551–577).

Horan, C., & Saiedian, H. (2021). Cyber crime investigation: Landscape, challenges, and future research directions.
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy,
1(4), 580–596.

Hou, J., Li, Y., Yu, J., & Shi, W. (2019). A survey on digital forensics in internet of things.
IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1–1.

Koto, I. (2021). Cyber crime according to the ITE law.
International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS,
2(2).

Losavio, M. M., Pastukov, P., Polyakova, S., Zhang, X., Chow, K. P., Koltay, A., James, J., & Ortiz, M. E. (2019). The juridical spheres for digital forensics and electronic evidence in the insecure electronic world.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science,
1(5).

Mohsin, K. (2021). The internet and its opportunities for cybercrime – Interpersonal cybercrime.
SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rajput, N., & Chudasama, D. (2021). Protecting ourselves from digital crimes.
National Journal of Cyber Security Law ,
4(1).

Shah, A., & Chudasama, D. (2021). Investigating various approaches and ways to detect cybercrime.
Journal of Network Security,
9(2), 12–20.