Criteria
Excellent
18 points
Very Good
17 points
Good
15 points
Fair
13 points
Poor
9 points
Not Acceptable or Missing
0 points
Criterion Score
Introduction and Thesis
Excellent introduction and thesis statement.
Very good introduction and thesis statement. Missing 1 or 2 minor details.
Good introduction and thesis statement. Missing several minor details.
Fair introduction and thesis statement. Missing some major details.
Poor introduction and thesis statement. Many major details missing.
Introduction and/or thesis statement is not understandable
-or-
No introduction or thesis statement
Score of Introduction and Thesis,
/ 18
Significance of the Topic
Excellent statement of the significance and relevance of the topic.
Very good statement of the significance and relevance of the topic. Missing 1 or 2 minor details.
Good statement of the significance and relevance of the topic, with several minor details missing.
Fair statement of the significance and relevance of the topic, with some major details missing.
Difficult to understand or insufficient statement of the significance and relevance of the topic.
Significance of the topic is not addressed.
Score of Significance of the Topic,
/ 18
Theoretical Background
Excellent and comprehensive discussion of theoretical background related to the topic
Very good discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with 1-2 minor details missing
Good discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with several minor details missing
Fair discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with several major details missing
Poor discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with many minor details missing
Response is not understandable
-or-
No discussion of theoretical background
Score of Theoretical Background,
/ 18
Current Research
Excellent incorporation of at least 10 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
Sources are primarily scholarly academic sources and examine social determinant effects.
Effectively incorporates 8-9 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a number of scholarly academic sources.
Effectively incorporates 6-7 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a few scholarly academic sources.
Effectively incorporates 4-5 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a few scholarly academic sources.
Effectively incorporates 1-3 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research.
May rely almost exclusively on nonacademic sources.
Does not incorporate any recent, credible, and relevant sources that examine current research
-or-
No discussion of current research
Score of Current Research,
/ 18
Role of Public Policy
Excellent and comprehensive discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic
Very good discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with 1-2 minor details missing
Good discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with several minor details missing
Fair discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with several major details missing
Poor discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with major details missing
Response is not understandable
-or-
No discussion of the role of public policy
Score of Role of Public Policy,
/ 18
Proposal of an Evidence-Based Policy
Excellent and comprehensive proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults
Very good proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with 1-2 minor details missing
Good proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with several minor details missing
Fair proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with several major details missing
Poor proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with many major details missing
Response is not understandable
-or-
No proposal presented
Score of Proposal of an Evidence-Based Policy,
/ 18
Conclusion
Excellent conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points of the paper, highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions.
Very good conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points of the paper and highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. Missing 1 or 2 minor details.
Good conclusion that summarizes the main points of the paper and highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. Missing several minor details.
Fair conclusion that summarizes the main points of the paper but is missing several major details.
Poor conclusion that does not effectively summarize the main points of the paper and is missing many major details.
Response is not understandable
-or-
No conclusion
Score of Conclusion,
/ 18
Criteria
Excellent
12 points
Very Good
11 points
Good
10 points
Fair
8 points
Poor
6 points
Not Acceptable or Missing
0 points
Criterion Score
Writing Quality
Very well-written.
There are no mechanical or grammatical errors.
There are very few mechanical or grammatical errors.
There are several minor mechanical or grammatical errors.
There are several major mechanical or grammatical errors.
There are many major mechanical or grammatical errors that impact readability.
Response is not understandable
-or-
No submission
Score of Writing Quality,
/ 12
APA Citations and Formatting
There are no errors in APA citation or formatting.
There are 1-2 minor errors in citation or formatting.
There are several minor errors in citation or formatting.
There are several major errors in citation or formatting.
There are many major errors in citation or formatting.
Citations are missing
-and/or-
No attempt at formatting
Score of APA Citations and Formatting,
/ 12
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more