HSE 400 Week 4 Essay: Introduction, Outline, and Closing w/ References

This week, 
your intro, outline, and closing with references is due. Your paper should
 include your bibliography and be 

1-2 pages in length
. At
 least 
4 references
 should be used to support your main points. 

Quoted material should be avoided.

 Instead, please provide paraphrased research to support your main points that are accompanied with in-text references. Be sure to follow APA formatting guidelines. (see example page, annotated bibliography, and rubric below)

Example Page

Title page:
The title page is the first page of a manuscript (name, date). It contains the running head, page number, title of the paper, author name, affiliation, and any author notes. In student paper, running head is not required unless requested. Everything on the title page is centered as well.

For example:

Title*

Student Name

College

Course Name

Professor Name

Due Date

Introduction:

Introduce your topic and why it is important. Begin with a hook that peaks the readers interest and encourages them to continue reading the paper. Describe the background information that explains the context of your paper. Then establish the reason your topic/research is important. Present your evidence and/or argument.

Outline:

Create an outline of the structure of your paper. Typically this is provided in a bulleted format with brief descriptions of what the paper will contain. Begin with the subject of the paper, map out the ideas or topics you wish to cover or include, organize it in a structure that logically flows, implement headings and subheadings for hierarchy.

Example:

I. First point

a. Sub-point

II. Second point

a. Sub-point

Closing:

State your conclusion and recommended course of action. Restate key facts that drive home the points you intended.

References:

Don’t forget to include a references page.

Annotated Bibliography

Captured Individual Who Has Filed a Lawsuit Against the Government for Wrongful Detention: Annotated Bibliography

Possley, M. J., Jackson, K., & Stephens, K. H. (2020). Senior Researcher Kaitlin Jackson Roll. NATIONAL REGISTRY of EXONERATIONS SEPTEMBER, 1.

This source discusses government malfeasance that led to false convictions, including inmates who were exonerated. The National Registry of Exonerations data and analyses illuminate legal and moral issues in such cases. The source’s data and in-depth case studies demonstrate systemic shortcomings that can lead to unlawful detentions. The source may not be impartial and may be influenced by the government. The findings emphasize the need for criminal justice accountability and reform to prevent unlawful detentions.

This source presents real evidence of similar cases, emphasizing the legal and moral issues of a captured individual suing the government for unlawful detention. Discussions about government accountability, criminal justice reform, and individual rights are intertwined. The source’s reliability is enhanced by collecting and analyzing extensive data from the National Registry of Exonerations. Kaitlin Jackson Roll is a Senior Researcher, Keith H. Stephens is a researcher and writer, and Michael J. Possley is an experienced criminal justice and legal journalist. Their backgrounds provide credibility to the source. I find this material helpful for understanding the real-world effects of unlawful detentions and government actions.

Schweikert, J. (2020, September 14). Qualified Immunity: A Legal, Practical, and Moral Failure. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/qualified-immunity-legal-practical-moral-failure

Schweikert (2020) critiques qualified immunity’s legal, practical, and moral flaws. The author explores how qualified immunity protects government officials from civil litigation for official activities that violate constitutional rights. Its extensive investigation of the doctrine’s impact on justice and accountability is a strength. It may be one-sided, focused on the negative. The article finds that qualified immunity threatens accountability, justice for government wrongdoing victims, and an equitable legal system. This site examines the legal and moral failings of qualified immunity, a notion typically claimed in captured individuals’ lawsuits against the government for illegal incarceration. It addresses police misbehavior, civil rights, and legal accountability. The Cato Institute research fellow Jay Schweikert specializes in criminal justice and civil liberties. Based on legal studies and case studies, Schweikert’s analysis is sound. His viewpoint supports restricted or updated qualified immunity, but readers should explore other viewpoints and sources.

Stevenson, M. T., & Mayson, S. G. (2022). Pretrial detention and the value of liberty. Virginia Law Review, 108, 709.

Stevenson and Mayson (2022) discuss the legal and moral ramifications of pretrial confinement, focusing on liberty in government wrongful detention litigation. The writers carefully examine how extended pretrial confinement violates fundamental rights and argue about the balance between society’s safety and personal freedom. Their thorough study shows how such cases may protect civil liberties. The writers’ research and legal skills provide credence to their conclusions, but more real-world case studies would improve the article. The source contributes to discussions about the ethics and legitimacy of government detention, making it relevant to understanding the legal and moral aspects of wrongfully held people’s claims. The work also addresses civil rights, criminal justice, and state-individual relations. The article lacks research methodology, however, the writers’ links with prominent institutions increase its reliability. In conclusion, Stevenson and Mayson offer essential insight into liberty, government accountability, and wrongful imprisonment claims.

Coleman, J., Hershovitz, S., & Mendlow, G. (2019).
Theories of the Common Law of Torts (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford.edu. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tort-theories/

This source examines tort theories in this source. They examine tort law’s intellectual basis and theories that explain it. Its comprehensive tort theory analysis and legal philosophy integration make this source strong. However, it may be too theoretical for legal applicability. The authors conclude that tort law is complex and that no single theory can adequately explain it. This source is relevant because it discusses tort law, which underpins wrongful detention lawsuits. It can help explain the captured individual’s lawsuit and prospective government claims. The source’s investigation of theories can also aid in judging the suit’s legal and moral implications. The junction of law and ethics, legal philosophy, and ideas of justice are related to this source. It does not focus on real-world legal procedures or cases. From a philosophical perspective rather than an empirical investigation, the source doesn’t evaluate the research technique. The three authors, Coleman, Hershovitz, and Mendlow are renowned philosophers with backgrounds in tort law and legal theory.

References

Coleman, J., Hershovitz, S., & Mendlow, G. (2019).
Theories of the Common Law of Torts (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford.edu. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tort-theories/

Possley, M. J., Jackson, K., & Stephens, K. H. (2020). Senior Researcher Kaitlin Jackson Roll.
NATIONAL REGISTRY of EXONERATIONS SEPTEMBER,
1. https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Government_Misconduct_and_Convicting_the_Innocent.pdf

Schweikert, J. (2020, September 14).
Qualified Immunity: A Legal, Practical, and Moral Failure. Cato Institute.
https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/qualified-immunity-legal-practical-moral-failure

Stevenson, M. T., & Mayson, S. G. (2022). Pretrial detention and the value of liberty. Virginia Law Review, 108, 709.

Wk 4 Intro, Outline, and Closing w/ References Rubric Rubric

Intro, Outline, and Closing w/ References Rubric 
(100 points):